Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text?

compilers@is-not-my.name
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:32:13 -0000

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[11 earlier articles]
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compiler.ddj@h-rd.org (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? arnold@skeeve.com (2012-04-20)
[26 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: compilers@is-not-my.name
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:32:13 -0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 12-04-024
Keywords: books
Posted-Date: 19 Apr 2012 23:16:52 EDT

derek@nospam.knosof.co.uk wrote


> I always recommend:
> A Retargetable C Compiler: Design and Implementation
> by David R. Hanson and Christopher W. Fraser


Thanks.


> If you are weak on math you might have a problem getting your head
> around recursion.


I'm sure I don't understand recursion like a mathematician understands it. I
think I understand the applied use of it.


> If you cannot understand recursion your compiler writing days are
> finished.


Before they even started, how sad!


> > I think of all the compilers were written in the DOS days and there
> > were normal guys writing them, not Nobel math prizewinners. Shirley
>
> In my experience compiler writers are not normal guys, but then I
> am a vested interest.


You're probably right since the more I look at it the more it seems
the 90/10 rule applies. 90% of compilers were written by the same
guys. Small group after all. I guess you (plural) have a vested
interested in keeping the group small ;-)
[Back when I was a grad student, I taught the compilers course required
for all CS majors. Some of them even wrote compilers that worked. -John]



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.