Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-09) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-06-10) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-11) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-06-11) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2008-06-11) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit rich@pennware.com (Richard Pennington) (2008-06-14) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-06-18) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit theresistor@gmail.com (2008-06-20) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05) |
| Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05) |
| From: | scholz.lothar@gmail.com |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:48:29 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 08-06-018 08-06-022 08-06-026 |
| Keywords: | Eiffel, code |
| Posted-Date: | 17 Jun 2008 19:23:22 EDT |
On 15 Jun., 06:59, Richard Pennington <r...@pennware.com> wrote:
> I'm having a hard time understanding why LLVM doesn't work for you. It
> can look like a traditional code generator back end but you can also
> JIT compile the LLVM bitcode, rather than generating assembly language
> and linking it.
Well i have to say that it is really heavy. And i don't need a lot of
optimizations and features they offer, because for the optimized final
call i will write pure C anyway.
And more important for my feeling of not useing LLVM is that Windows
seems to have no high priority for the developers. None of the latest
releases compiles 100% without errors. 2.2 didn't compile at all.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.