Re: Suggestions required please ....

dwight@pentasoft.com (Dwight VandenBerghe)
6 Apr 1999 22:47:30 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Suggestions required please .... markagr@aol.com (1999-04-03)
Re: Suggestions required please .... dwight@pentasoft.com (1999-04-06)
Re: Suggestions required please .... dobes@mindless.com (Dobes Vandermeer) (1999-04-06)
Re: Suggestions required please .... markagr@aol.com (1999-04-09)
Re: Suggestions required please .... rspartan@usa.net (1999-04-09)
Re: Suggestions required please .... markagr@aol.com (1999-04-10)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: dwight@pentasoft.com (Dwight VandenBerghe)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Apr 1999 22:47:30 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 99-04-015
Keywords: design

On 3 Apr 1999 21:54:53 -0500, markagr@aol.com (MarkAGr) wrote:
> I'm designing an OOA/OOD tool and have got to the point where I
>need to think of a prose representation for a UML-like methodology.


Mark, you could do worse that to use MOF - the Meta-Object Facility
that is used to define both UML and its constraint language, OCL. It
is lean and mean, reflective, powerful enough to define itself as well
as "languages" like UML. You can get pointers to the spec from the
OMG website, I think : www.omg.org.


Dwight





Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.