Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits?

Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
10 Aug 1998 10:16:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? jhardin@wolfenet.com (1998-07-30)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? albaugh@agames.com (1998-07-31)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1998-07-31)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1998-08-02)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? dlmoore@pgroup.com (David L Moore) (1998-08-02)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? pizka@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (1998-08-03)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-08-04)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (1998-08-10)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? eodell@pobox.com (1998-08-13)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? khays@sequent.com (1998-08-16)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? shriram@cs.rice.edu (Shriram Krishnamurthi) (1998-08-16)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? conway@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-08-16)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? genew@vip.net (1998-08-17)
Re: A way to prevent buffer overflow exploits? conway@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-08-17)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Aug 1998 10:16:10 -0400
Organization: Cognitive Dissidents
References: 98-07-242 98-08-005
Keywords: design, practice, Lisp

David L Moore wrote:


> By first class polymorphism I mean that it is possible to declare
> variables to have polymorphic types in exactly the same situations
> that you can declare objects of exact types. If there are other
> languages in the class, please draw my attention to them.


I hasten to point out the LISP family of languages -- though that
may not be what you mean; in LISP languages, types are dynamic, so
all objects are of polymorphic type. It is only with extensions
that it becomes *possible* to declare an object to have a fixed
type.


Ray Dillinger
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.