Re: visual parse

John Lilley <>
22 Jan 1997 23:05:18 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
visual parse (Michael Roach) (1997-01-16)
Re: visual parse (1997-01-16)
Re: visual parse (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (1997-01-22)
Re: visual parse (John Lilley) (1997-01-22)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: John Lilley <>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Jan 1997 23:05:18 -0500
Organization: Nerds for Hire, Inc.
References: 97-01-118 97-01-174
Keywords: parse, tools

Michael Roach said:
> I just started using Visual Parse++ 2.0 by SandStone for Windows

Quinn Tyler Jackson wrote:
> I use, am very happy with it, and would love to chat about it with
> anyone who's also using it.

I know people who use it for small-to-medium languages and are quite
happy with it. I tried it for C++ and found it did not scale well
(the analysis started taking forever). I also found it hard to create
hacks to resolve the truly nasty C++ ambiguities, so I gave up and
used PCCTS.

john lilley

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.