Re: language syntax for representing concurrency

Thomas Dejanovic wrote:
> So does anyone have some neat ideas for representing such a
> concept _clearly_ in an OO way in a language ?


How about:


process = {thread1, thread2, thread3, ..., threadn};


or


subsystem1 = {thread1,...,threadn};
process = {subsystem1, thread1,..., threadn, subsystemn};


Where "threadn" represents threadn's start routine.


Or, something like


define thread1 is_a_member_of process1;


or


define thread1 is_a_member_of subsystem1;


Brian "Ye' Ol' Set Membership"
--

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.