Parser Performance

Mark Probert <Mark.Probert@hamlet.ot.com.au>
21 Mar 1996 23:44:09 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Parser Performance Mark.Probert@hamlet.ot.com.au (Mark Probert) (1996-03-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Mark Probert <Mark.Probert@hamlet.ot.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 Mar 1996 23:44:09 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: parse, performance, question

I have noticed that there are quite a few "generic" parsers freely
available. Has anyone done a head-to-head on them comparing such
things as throughput, maintenance, portability and so on? I am more
interested in the similarities rather than the differences. Off the
top of my head the list could include:


(f)lex/(b)yacc-bison
coco
parts of cocktail
antlr


mark.




=====================================================================
Mark Probert Em. markp@ot.com.au
Open Technology Pty Ltd Ph. 61-2-9964 9633
L12, 80 Mount St Nth Sydney 2060 Australia Fx. 61-2-9957 5342
=====================================================================


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.