Re: 'Superoptimizers'

jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Jan Vorbrueggen)
Thu, 23 Nov 1995 13:44:32 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: 'Superoptimizers' glew@ichips.intel.com (1995-11-09)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' cdg@nullstone.com (1995-11-14)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' bill@amber.ssd.hcsc.com (1995-11-15)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' theoblit@wam.umd.edu (1995-11-17)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (1995-11-20)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' hbaker@netcom.com (1995-11-21)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com (1995-11-22)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1995-11-23)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' bill@amber.ssd.hcsc.com (1995-11-27)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' chase@centerline.com (1995-11-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks,comp.compilers,comp.arch
From: jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Jan Vorbrueggen)
Keywords: benchmarks, optimize
Organization: Institut fuer Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Germany
References: <47b2fl$d4l@news.ox.ac.uk> 95-11-080 95-11-153
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 13:44:32 GMT

theoblit@wam.umd.edu (Jason Taylor) writes:


      (I think that only the equiv. of "-O" should have been allowed in spec95
      for this very reason, so that I don't pull out hairs wondering what I
      should do to shave some time off a 3 hour run.)


It's already there - just ignire the SPEC95 values and only use SPEC95base.


Jan
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.