Related articles |
---|
Is register stack compilers' friend? jaidi@technet.sg (1995-10-31) |
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? hbaker@netcom.com (1995-11-04) |
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? cliffc@ami.sps.mot.com (1995-11-05) |
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? stevec@pact.srf.ac.uk (1995-11-06) |
Is register stack compilers' friend? dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1995-11-06) |
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? paulb@pablo.taligent.com (1995-11-09) |
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? jeremy@suede.sw.oz.au (1995-11-13) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | paulb@pablo.taligent.com (Paul Beusterien) |
Keywords: | architecture |
Organization: | Taligent, Inc. |
References: | 95-11-026 |
Date: | Thu, 9 Nov 1995 02:28:25 GMT |
I would like to hear from anyone having experience with writing compilers
for transputer. Register stack Vs large register file: which is better for
the compiler?
And it makes instruction scheduling especially ugly. Has there been anything
published about this ? In particular, scheduling floating point code for
the X86 family?
--
Paul Beusterien
Paul_Beusterien@taligent.com
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.