Re: Is register stack compilers' friend?

paulb@pablo.taligent.com (Paul Beusterien)
Thu, 9 Nov 1995 02:28:25 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Is register stack compilers' friend? jaidi@technet.sg (1995-10-31)
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? hbaker@netcom.com (1995-11-04)
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? cliffc@ami.sps.mot.com (1995-11-05)
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? stevec@pact.srf.ac.uk (1995-11-06)
Is register stack compilers' friend? dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1995-11-06)
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? paulb@pablo.taligent.com (1995-11-09)
Re: Is register stack compilers' friend? jeremy@suede.sw.oz.au (1995-11-13)
| List of all articles for this month |

Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: paulb@pablo.taligent.com (Paul Beusterien)
Keywords: architecture
Organization: Taligent, Inc.
References: 95-11-026
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 02:28:25 GMT

      I would like to hear from anyone having experience with writing compilers
      for transputer. Register stack Vs large register file: which is better for
      the compiler?


And it makes instruction scheduling especially ugly. Has there been anything
published about this ? In particular, scheduling floating point code for
the X86 family?
--


Paul Beusterien
Paul_Beusterien@taligent.com
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.