Sisal?

wchang@genome.lbl.gov (William Chang)
Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:46:26 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Sisal? wchang@genome.lbl.gov (1994-09-14)
Re: Sisal? preston@tera.com (1994-09-18)
Re: Sisal? buyukisik_o_f@ae.ge.com (U-E59264-Osman Buyukisik) (1994-09-19)
Re: Sisal? miller@diego.llnl.gov (1994-09-19)
Re: Sisal? bernecky@eecg.toronto.edu (Robert Bernecky) (1994-09-19)
Re: Sisal? bernecky@eecg.toronto.edu (Robert Bernecky) (1994-09-21)
Re: Sisal? bernecky@eecg.toronto.edu (Robert Bernecky) (1994-09-23)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.functional
From: wchang@genome.lbl.gov (William Chang)
Followup-To: comp.lang.misc
Keywords: functional, question
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:46:26 GMT

Where might I find discussions/critiques/rebuttals regarding Sisal?
Is this dataflow/single-assignment language "functional", and how does it
manage to beat Fortran? I have already looked at sisal.llnl.gov.
-- Bill Chang (wchang@cshl.org)
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.