Re: What's the word for...

norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (Norman Ramsey)
Sat, 19 Feb 1994 16:33:06 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: What's the word for... tjj@netnews.summit.novell.com (1994-02-17)
Re: What's the word for... lawley@kurango.cit.gu.edu.au (1994-02-18)
Re: What's the word for... PJENSEN@CSI.compuserve.com (1994-02-18)
Re: What's the word for... marcoj@iro.umontreal.ca (Marco Jacques) (1994-02-18)
Re: What's the word for... galibero@mines.u-nancy.fr (1994-02-18)
Re: What's the word for... glockner@cosc.bsu.umd.edu (Alexander Glockner) (1994-02-18)
Re: What's the word for... norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (1994-02-19)
Re: What's the word for... tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (1994-02-20)
Re: What's the word for... moreaux@litsun31.epfl.ch (1994-02-20)
Re: What's the word for... sasghm@unx.sas.com (1994-02-21)
Re: What's the word for... weberwu@tfh-berlin.de (1994-02-21)
Re: What's the word for... jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1994-02-22)
Re: What's the word for... andrewd@apanix.apana.org.au (1994-02-22)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (Norman Ramsey)
Keywords: theory
Organization: Bellcore, Morristown NJ
References: 94-02-106
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 1994 16:33:06 GMT

CNS-ksf-+Jordan T.J. <tjj@netnews.summit.novell.com> wrote:
>Could someone please tell me what the word is for a language
>which can be written in itself?


Some time back I saw something Luca Cardelli had written containing a
hierarchy of such questions. (It *may* have been his report on
`typeful programming'; I don't have a copy to check.) I don't
remember the exact hierarchy, but it was something like this.
Can the language write its own:
    1 interpreter?
    2 translator?
    3 garbage collector?
    4 run-time system?
    5 operating system?
I don't remember whether he had any terminology attached to these
criteria. Perhaps someone who remembers the report can identify it
for you.
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.