object/load module formats

Shaun Wilkinson <shaun@rdc31.std.com>
Tue, 15 Feb 1994 21:45:42 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
object/load module formats shaun@rdc31.std.com (Shaun Wilkinson) (1994-02-15)
object/load module formats ssimmons@convex.com (1994-02-16)
Re: object/load module formats sdm7g@elvis.med.virginia.edu (Steven D. Majewski) (1994-02-16)
Re: object/load module formats geoff@fcca.csi.com (1994-02-16)
Re: object/load module formats jprice@cadev5.intel.com (1994-02-19)
Re: object/load module formats brent@jade.ssd.csd.harris.com (1994-02-20)
Re: object/load module formats rfg@netcom.com (1994-02-24)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Shaun Wilkinson <shaun@rdc31.std.com>
Keywords: question, linker, comment
Organization: Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 21:45:42 GMT

Dear everyone,


We are developing cross-tools (compilers, linkers, ...) for
microprocessors that we manufacture. These tools will primarily run on
Unix workstations (SUN, Hp, ...).


We`re thinking of changing the object/load module format of our cross
tools. Does someone know about standard/popular object/load module format
which are suitable for our purpose? (we need their documents, license
free.) What are the current trends in this area?


If you have some idea or information, please let me know.


-- Shaun Wilkinson
      shaun@ca.merl.com
[SVR4 has ELF, OSF/1 has ROSE, and GNU has a souped up BSD format. Is anyone
moving toward anything else? -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.