Re: Adding garbage collection to C++

fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON)
Fri, 21 Aug 1992 07:22:25 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[10 earlier articles]
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@idiap.ch (1992-08-17)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ hudson@cs.umass.edu (1992-08-17)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1992-08-18)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (1992-08-18)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (1992-08-19)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (1992-08-20)
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1992-08-21)
| List of all articles for this month |

Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON)
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 07:22:25 GMT
Followup-To: comp.lang.c++
References: 92-08-052 92-08-112
Keywords: C++, GC, design, comment

tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (Thomas M. Breuel) writes:


>As I said before, I don't advocate this scheme. It's a cute solution to an
>interesting puzzle, nothing more.


Ah, yes, but I was disputing whether you had solved the puzzle! :-)
I would certainly agree that the question is purely academic.
To be fair, however, I think that the puzzle should include at least
the following rules: any solution must
- work for any strictly conforming program;
- allow separate compilation;
- not cause memory leaks.
Unfortunately including these conditions makes the puzzle unsolveable, IMHO :-(.


(We seem to have strayed away from serious compiler buisiness.
Follow-ups to comp.lang.c++).


--
Fergus Henderson fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU
[Enough already of this discussion, it's getting mired in details. -John]
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.