gcc vs. Greenhills vs. MRI

miklg@steinway.acuson.com (Michael Goldman)
Mon, 28 Oct 91 11:04:39 PST

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
gcc vs. Greenhills vs. MRI miklg@steinway.acuson.com (1991-10-28)
Re: gcc vs. Greenhills vs. MRI wgstuken@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (1991-10-29)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: miklg@steinway.acuson.com (Michael Goldman)
Keywords: C, performance, question, 68000, GCC
Organization: Compilers Central
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 91 11:04:39 PST

Hi,


We are looking at a cross-development environment entailing compiling on
Sparcstations and running on 68040s. The compilers of interest are
Microtec Research Inc., Greenhills, and GCC. We would be greatly
interested in any recent benchmarks of executable run times, compile time,
and code size, as well as any experiences of bugs, or problems. The main
reason to look at MRI and Greenhills is that their source debuggers are
supported by HP emulators. HP is currently the only one with a 68040
emulator. A related question is does anyone know of a utility that would
translate GCC output to the IEEE-695 format that the Microtec Research
compiler generates for use by the emulator ?


The more specific the better. You can email me at <miklg@acuson.com> or
post as suits you.


Thanks very much,
Michael Goldman
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.