|Are Better Linkers Possible? firstname.lastname@example.org (1991-08-20)|
|Re: Are Better Linkers Possible? email@example.com (1991-08-21)|
|Re: Are Better Linkers Possible? firstname.lastname@example.org (Martin Leiser) (1991-08-22)|
|Re: Are Better Linkers Possible? email@example.com (1991-08-24)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (David Keppel)|
|Organization:||Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle|
|Date:||Wed, 21 Aug 91 18:56:53 GMT|
email@example.com (Ron Westfall) writes:
>[What else should be in the linker?]
There are lots of good reasons for putting things in the linker. Be
careful, though, of putting too much in the linker. Compile cycles
(recompile both foo.c and bar.c) can go in parallel, linker cycles
cannot (or at least are hard to do).
;-D on ( Symbolically Unresolved Issues ) Pardo
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.