Full LL(1) versus Strong LL(1)... what's the diff?

reidmp@maine.maine.edu (Reid M. Pinchback)
Wed, 13 Mar 91 13:20:41 EST

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Full LL(1) versus Strong LL(1)... what's the diff? reidmp@maine.maine.edu (1991-03-13)
Re: Full LL(1) versus Strong LL(1)... what's the diff? vsnyder@jato.jpl.nasa.gov (1991-03-14)
Re: Full LL(1) versus Strong LL(1)... what's the diff? VM1!MAINE!REIDMP.BITNET@gatech.edu (Reid M. Pinchback) (1991-03-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: reidmp@maine.maine.edu (Reid M. Pinchback)
Keywords: LL(1), question
Organization: Compilers Central
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 91 13:20:41 EST

In "Crafting a Compiler" (Fischer & LeBlanc), the pros and cons
of a strong LL(1) versus a full LL(1) parser are discussed. The
text implies that the example code in the book is for a strong LL(1)
parser. It doesn't clearly mention how the actual construction of
the parser differs for the two cases.


Here is the question: How does *construction* of a full LL(1) parser
differ from construction of a strong LL(1) parser? How could you tell
the difference when looking at sample code?


Thanx in advance
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.