Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading

pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
7 Sep 90 16:52:16 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading daveg@near.cs.caltech.edu (1990-09-03)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading dmw9q@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (1990-09-05)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading pase@orville.nas.nasa.gov (1990-09-06)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading tub!wg@relay.EU.net (1990-09-06)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading pase@orville.nas.nasa.gov (Douglas M. Pase) (1990-09-06)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading ok@goanna.cs.rmit.OZ.AU (1990-09-07)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading pardo@cs.washington.edu (1990-09-07)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading pardo@cs.washington.edu (1990-09-07)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading mmengel@cuuxb.ATT.COM (1990-09-11)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading freek@fwi.uva.nl (1990-09-10)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) (1990-09-13)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading voss@suna0.cs.uiuc.edu (1990-09-14)
Re: Defining polymorphism vs. overloading stt@inmet.inmet.com (1990-09-15)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Keywords: polymorphism
Organization: University of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle
References: <8133@amelia.nas.nasa.gov>
Date: 7 Sep 90 16:52:16 GMT

>[Ongoing discussion of overloading and polymorphism]


To summarize:


Given the name of of an operator where that operator applies to
several types, the operator is


* Polymorphic if all implementations are derived from a single
    specification.
* Ad-hoc polymorphic or overloaded if the implementations are derived
    from several specifications.


Oversimplified, but close?


;-D on ( A rose by any other name would be polymorphic ) Pardo
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
        {rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.