Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| From: | gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 23-03-001 23-03-002 23-03-003 23-03-007 23-03-008 23-03-012 23-03-017 23-03-022 23-03-029 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="71899"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | conference |
| Posted-Date: | 29 Mar 2023 04:46:55 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: | 23-03-029 |
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 1:14:29 AM UTC-7, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
(snip)
> Then, from the compiler writer viewpoint, it's not sufficient to define
> a new language and a compiler for it, instead it must placed on top of
> some popular "firmware" like Java VM, CLR or C/C++ standard libraries,
> or else a dedicated back-end and libraries have to be implemented on
> each supported platform.
From an announcement today here on an ACM organized conference:
"We encourage authors to prepare their artifacts for submission
and make them more portable, reusable and customizable using
open-source frameworks including Docker, OCCAM, reprozip,
CodeOcean and CK."
I hadn't heard about those until I read that one, but it does sound
interesting.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.