Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees?

Steve Limb <stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com>
Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:14:41 +0000

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2022-02-06)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2022-02-06)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? johann@myrkraverk.com (Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson) (2022-02-07)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2022-02-07)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com (Christopher F Clark) (2022-02-07)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? alexfrunews@gmail.com (Alexei A. Frounze) (2022-02-07)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com (Steve Limb) (2022-02-08)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? jonathan@gold.bkis-orchard.net (Jonathan Thornburg) (2022-02-08)
Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? johann@myrkraverk.invalid (Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson) (2022-02-11)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Steve Limb <stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:14:41 +0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 22-02-004 22-02-005
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="85722"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: parse, tools
Posted-Date: 08 Feb 2022 09:49:17 EST
In-Reply-To: 22-02-005

Antlr has a UI for parts of this. Not sure if you can print it though.
It tends to get a bit ‘deep’ for a more complete grammar.




> On 6 Feb 2022, at 21:07, gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 10:28:41 AM UTC-8, Johann 'Myrkraverk'
Oskarsson wrote:
>
>> Are there any resources, or papers, about the subject of representing
>> syntax trees graphically? Given the idea that a compiler reads syntax
>> and generates code, all I have to do to "print" it, is to generate post-
>> script. Surely this has been done before.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.