Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes

luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email>
Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:56:15 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email (luser droog) (2020-08-15)
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes davidlovemore@gmail.com (David Lovemore) (2020-08-16)
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email (luser droog) (2020-08-20)
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email (luser droog) (2020-08-23)
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email (luser droog) (2020-08-23)
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes tkoenig@netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig) (2020-08-24)
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email (luser droog) (2020-08-28)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Followup-To: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 20-08-002 20-08-009 20-08-010 20-08-011 20-08-012 20-08-014 20-08-015 20-08-017
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="87046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: tools, comment
Posted-Date: 29 Aug 2020 12:59:45 EDT

On Monday, August 24, 2020 at 2:12:13 PM UTC-5, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email.dmarc.email.dmarc.email> schrieb:
>
> [PostScript]
>
> > But the language itself I just really enjoy. It's my "Lego blocks"
> > language. The RPN syntax removes all ambiguity about precedence and
> > sequencing.
>
> I recently had the doubtful pleasure of evaluating the formula
>
> x = ((a-b)*c^2+(-d^2+e^2-a^2+b^2)*c+a^2*b+(f^2-e^2-b^2)*a
> +(-f^2+d^2)*b)/((-2*d+2*e)*c+(2*f-2*e)*a-2*b*(f-d))
>
> in Postscript. (Yes, really. Don't ask.)
>


In case you need it, I've got a PostScript debugger that can single
step into loops and procedures.


https://github.com/luser-dr00g/debug.ps


$ gsnd db5.ps
GPL Ghostscript 9.52 (2020-03-19)
Copyright (C) 2020 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
This software is supplied under the GNU AGPLv3 and comes with NO WARRANTY:
see the file COPYING for details.
GS>{ 0 0 1 5 { add } for } stepon traceon debug
  %|-
0 %|- 0
0 %|- 0 0
1 %|- 0 0 1
5 %|- 0 0 1 5
{add} %|- 0 0 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?s
  %|- 0 0
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 0
1 %|- 0 1
1 %|- 0 1 1
5 %|- 0 1 1 5
{add} %|- 0 1 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 0 1
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 1
2 %|- 1 2
1 %|- 1 2 1
5 %|- 1 2 1 5
{add} %|- 1 2 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 1 2
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 3
3 %|- 3 3
1 %|- 3 3 1
5 %|- 3 3 1 5
{add} %|- 3 3 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 3 3
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 6
4 %|- 6 4
1 %|- 6 4 1
5 %|- 6 4 1 5
{add} %|- 6 4 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 6 4
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 10
5 %|- 10 5
1 %|- 10 5 1
5 %|- 10 5 1 5
{add} %|- 10 5 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 10 5
add nametype object add step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
  %|- 15
6 %|- 15 6
1 %|- 15 6 1
5 %|- 15 6 1 5
{add} %|- 15 6 1 5 {add}
for nametype object for step: (continue|next|bypass|step|prompt|quit)?
GS<1>==
15
GS>quit


[This is drifting rather far from compilers now. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.