Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux?

arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins)
Thu, 29 Sep 2016 02:55:20 -0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[16 earlier articles]
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-26)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2016-09-30)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-30)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-30)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 02:55:20 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 16-09-001 16-09-033 16-09-034 16-09-036
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="94886"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C, practice
Posted-Date: 29 Sep 2016 21:33:51 EDT

In article 16-09-036,
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
>The i5 has 4 non-HT cores.


Works for me. :-)


>If you really have plenty of RAM, why not create a ramdisk? Or put
>in an SSD for the tmp filesystem?


I spent enough $$ for the laptop and it's fast enough in general. I
don't want to buy an SSD or move my work directory off the hard disk
in case of power failures or whatever.


>>Since I originally posted, someone suggested that I just fix tcc on
>>my own. I was able to do this with less than 2 hours work so now
>>I'm back to being fat, dumb and happy. :-)
>
>As long as you don't expect the same level of optimization. TCC is
>nice for quick development turn-around, but it doesn't produce the
>fastest code.


I am exactly interestsed in "quick development turn-around". :-)


Thanks,


Arnold
--
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.