Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs

George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:43:44 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Formatting of Language LRMs seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2014-06-17)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs seimarao@gmail.com (2014-06-24)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2014-06-24)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-06-26)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-06-28)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-28)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-06-28)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-06-29)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-06-29)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-29)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs genew@telus.net (Gene Wirchenko) (2014-06-30)
Re: specifying semantics, was Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-30)
Re: BNF, was specifying semantics wclodius@earthlink.net (2014-06-30)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:43:44 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 14-06-010 14-06-023 14-06-025 14-06-026
Keywords: algol60, history
Posted-Date: 28 Jun 2014 23:31:55 EDT

On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:10:27 +0100, Andy Walker <news@cuboid.co.uk>
wrote:


>On 26/06/14 05:54, George Neuner wrote:
>> [...] What we refer to as "Backus-Naur Form"
>> today is not the original used for Algol-58, [...].


>Backus proposed his system for "metalinguistic formulae" [as used
>in the Algol 60 report] in 1959, and it was adopted by Naur, the
>editor of the papers and the report defining Algol 60.


Yup, I goofed: BNF was Algol 60, not 58.


Incidentally, Naur didn't simply adopt Backus's forms, he made a
number of improvements. There was a move early to call it Backus
Normal Form, but Naur's contribution was deemed significant enough
that it came to called Backus-Naur instead.


George


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.