Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [30 earlier articles] |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-03-24) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-03-26) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-03-26) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-03-26) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? federation2005@netzero.com (2014-03-26) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2014-03-27) |
| Re: Is multi-level function return possible? monnier@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier) (2014-04-07) |
| From: | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:48:57 -0400 |
| Organization: | A noiseless patient Spider |
| References: | 14-03-020 14-03-022 14-03-025 14-03-030 14-03-044 14-03-046 14-03-047 14-03-048 14-03-053 14-03-057 14-03-060 14-03-067 |
| Keywords: | design, history |
| Posted-Date: | 07 Apr 2014 23:38:37 EDT |
> Many years ago I found a funny implementation of local variables in
> GfA-Basic.
[ Describes the mechanism used, e.g. in Emacs. ]
This gives you dynamic scoping: no closures.
Stefan
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.