Re: Programming language and IDE design

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:48:14 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[11 earlier articles]
Re: Programming language and IDE design martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2013-11-07)
Re: Programming language and IDE design gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2013-11-08)
Re: Programming language and IDE design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2013-11-08)
Re: Programming language and IDE design gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2013-11-08)
Re: Programming language and IDE design jthorn@astro.indiana.edu (Jonathan Thornburg) (2013-11-10)
Re: Programming language and IDE design martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2013-11-16)
Re: Programming language and IDE design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2013-11-16)
Re: Programming language and IDE design gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2013-11-18)
Re: Programming language and IDE design sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl) (2013-11-19)
Re: Programming language and IDE design gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2013-11-19)
Re: Programming language and IDE design jonathan@cobalt.astro.indiana.edu (Jonathan Thornburg) (2013-11-19)
Re: Programming language and IDE design wclodius@earthlink.net (2013-11-22)
Re: Programming language and IDE design robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2013-11-25)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:48:14 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 13-11-016
Keywords: C, parse
Posted-Date: 18 Nov 2013 13:38:53 EST

Martin Ward schrieb:
> On Friday 08 Nov 2013 at 21:04, George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
>> The majority of successful languages are LL(k) for small k. It's hard
>> to get much simpler than that for parsing.
>
> C is not LL(K),


C is LL(1) with one exception, which makes it LL(2). See my ToPas
project on SourceForge.


DoDi

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.