Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text?

compilers@is-not-my.name
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:06:21 -0000

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[22 earlier articles]
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? arnold@skeeve.com (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? jthorn@astro.indiana.edu (Jonathan Thornburg) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-21)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? askmeforit@myisp.com (Joe Schmo) (2012-04-21)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? norjaidi.tuah@ubd.edu.bn (Nor Jaidi Tuah) (2012-04-21)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? ulimakesacompiler@googlemail.com (Uli Kusterer) (2012-04-21)
[15 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: compilers@is-not-my.name
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:06:21 -0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 12-04-030
Keywords: books
Posted-Date: 20 Apr 2012 23:21:58 EDT

Bakul Shah <usenet@nospam.bitblocks.com> wrote:


> Check out Nils M Holm's "Practical Compiler Construction", available
> at lulu.com. It is a 365 page "tour" through a *complete* compiler for
> a subset of C language. The compiler can compile itself and you can
> download the code from author's site (www.t3x.org). It doesn't use
> lex or yacc (just a hand-rolled scanner and a recursive descent
> parser). The compiler is about 4300 lines of code. It describes all
> the key concepts but given the simple design doesn't go into a lot of
> details (beyond describing the code). The book describes a i386 code
> generator. The code generator interface seems well enough abstracted.
> When challenged, Nils put together a x86-64 backend in a day!


Thanks for the description on this. I have downloaded a bunch of free books
over the years and I do have this one. Part of my problem is sorting through
them and understanding if they're something I could use. Your comments are
very helpful especially since you mentioned he explains all the code and
doesn't use external tools.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.