Re: Language Design

mac <acolvin@efunct.com>
Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:11:48 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Language Design 81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashism (Billy Mays) (2011-07-18)
Re: Language Design usenet@rwaltman.com (Roberto Waltman) (2011-07-18)
Re: Language Design sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com (Srinivas Nayak) (2011-07-18)
Re: Language Design anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2011-07-19)
Re: Language Design zwinkau@kit.edu (Andreas Zwinkau) (2011-07-20)
Re: Language Design acolvin@efunct.com (mac) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com (Christophe de Dinechin) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design osesov@gmail.com (Oleg Sesov) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-07-26)
Re: Language Design thomas.mertes@gmx.at (tm) (2011-07-27)
Re: Language Design usenet@rwaltman.com (Roberto Waltman) (2011-07-28)
Re: Language Design s_dubrovich@yahoo.com (s_dubrovich@yahoo.com) (2011-08-04)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: mac <acolvin@efunct.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:11:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 11-07-027
Keywords: history, design
Posted-Date: 23 Jul 2011 02:42:01 EDT

> I'd rather not just re implement C or other commonly used languages, but
> I'm having a hard time coming up with something I'd actually want to use.


XPL?
It was populsr in the 16-bit days



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.