Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++?

Olaf Krzikalla <krzikalla@gmx.de>
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:46:07 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2010-02-10)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2010-02-10)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2010-02-11)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2010-02-13)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2010-02-14)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? wclodius@los-alamos.net (2010-02-13)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? krzikalla@gmx.de (Olaf Krzikalla) (2010-02-19)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? ng2010@att.net (ng2010) (2010-02-23)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2010-02-27)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? bartc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2010-02-28)
Re: Infinite look ahead required by C++? torbenm@diku.dk (2010-03-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Olaf Krzikalla <krzikalla@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:46:07 +0100
Organization: albasani.net
References: 10-02-024 10-02-037
Keywords: C++, parse
Posted-Date: 21 Feb 2010 00:19:34 EST

Adrian Thurston schrieb:
> Hi, I covered some of the difficulties in this paper:
>
> http://www.complang.org/thurston/thurston_CASCON_06_btlr.pdf


However you should have stated that your first C++ example (figure 1)
is indeed invalid C++. The difficulties you've described in the text to
that example lead to the introduction of "typename" in the C++98 standard.




Best regards
Olaf Krzikalla


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.