Re: x86-64 and calling conventions

Bart <bc@freeuk.com>
Wed, 14 May 2008 19:22:59 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-05-13)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2008-05-14)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions vidar.hokstad@gmail.com (Vidar Hokstad) (2008-05-14)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2008-05-14)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2008-05-15)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2008-05-15)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions bc@freeuk.com (Bart) (2008-05-14)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2008-05-15)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions bolek-compilers@curl.com (Boleslaw Ciesielski) (2008-05-23)
Re: x86-64 and calling conventions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-05-29)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Bart <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 19:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-05-031 08-05-037
Keywords: C, question
Posted-Date: 14 May 2008 22:41:40 EDT

On May 12, 11:10 am, "cr88192" <cr88...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "cr88192" <cr88...@hotmail.com> wrote in message


> a nearer term goal is to add both lexical closures and eval as C extensions
> (note: I already have garbage collection, dynamic types, geometric vectors
> and quaternions, ... as compiler extensions).


Dynamic types in C? How would that work from a programmer viewpoint?


--
Bartc

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.