Re: flex for windows

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:54:21 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: flex for windows DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows dickey@saltmine.radix.net (Thomas Dickey) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows dickey@saltmine.radix.net (Thomas Dickey) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows agdjh@gasjgdjagjdagdgaj.com (Gary R. Van Sickle) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows tprince@computer.org (Tim Prince) (2008-01-06)
Re: flex for windows DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-01-07)
Re: flex for windows cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-01-07)
Re: flex for windows rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (2008-01-09)
Re: flex for windows monnier@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier) (2008-01-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.c
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:54:21 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-12-040 07-12-043 07-12-047 07-12-053 07-12-056 08-01-013
Keywords: lex, Windows
Posted-Date: 07 Jan 2008 02:39:01 EST

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:


> Apparently NP-Hard "\r\n" Vs. "\n" EOL Problem".


What's the problem?


AFAIK a single "\r" is nowhere used for EOL, so it should be possible to
skip \r, and treat \n as EOL.


DoDi
[That's pretty typical, ignore the \r and look for the \n. But this doesn't
have much to do with compilers, as opposed to general Windows programming,
any more. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.