Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version3) - should it use C99 or C95?

Chris Hills <chris@phaedsys.org>
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:53:04 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
MISRA-C:2010 (version3) - should it use C99 or C95? chris@phaedsys.org (Chris Hills) (2007-09-10)
Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version3) - should it use C99 or C95? chris@phaedsys.org (Chris Hills) (2007-09-11)
Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version3) - should it use C99 or C95? spam@altium.nl (2007-09-11)
Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version3) - should it use C99 or C95? prenom_nomus@yahoo.com (Marco) (2007-09-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Chris Hills <chris@phaedsys.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:53:04 +0100
Organization: Phaedrus Systems
References: 07-09-023
Keywords: embedded
Posted-Date: 13 Sep 2007 00:57:37 EDT

>[MISRA C is a set of guidelines for writing C code for embedded
>applications in motor vehicles. Needless to say, it is an environment
>where bugs are bad. -John]


MISRA-C is for Critical Systems. It has not been specifically for
automotive use since the 2004 version.


The original version 1998 was aimed at the automotive market but
pretty soon escaped in to everything else. Now it is used outside the
automotive industry as much or more than inside. It is used in
aerospace, medical, control systems in fact almost anywhere embedded C
is used.


--
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.