Re: Looking for Basic compiler, was Generating a simple hand-coded like recursive descent parser

"Eric" <englere_geo@yahoo.com>
21 Sep 2006 10:33:59 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Generating a simple hand-coded like recursive descent parser mr.waverlye@verizon.net (Mr.E) (2006-09-08)
Re: Generating a simple hand-coded like recursive descent parser tommy.thorn@gmail.com (Tommy Thorn) (2006-09-10)
Re: Generating a simple hand-coded like recursive descent parser ArarghMail609@Arargh.com (2006-09-11)
Re: Looking for Basic compiler, was Generating a simple hand-coded lik englere_geo@yahoo.com (Eric) (2006-09-18)
Re: Looking for Basic compiler, was Generating a simple hand-coded lik ArarghMail609@Arargh.com (2006-09-18)
Re: Looking for Basic compiler, was Generating a simple hand-coded lik englere_geo@yahoo.com (Eric) (2006-09-21)
Re: Looking for Basic compiler, was Generating a simple hand-coded lik ArarghMail609a@Arargh.com (2006-09-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Eric" <englere_geo@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 Sep 2006 10:33:59 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-09-02906-09-042 06-09-043 06-09-094 06-09-101
Keywords: Basic
Posted-Date: 21 Sep 2006 10:33:59 EDT

ArarghMail609@Arargh.com wrote:


> >Have you considered making it open source?
>
> I have thought of it, however, some parts of the runtime have
> restrictions. Without the runtime, the compiler wouldn't be that
> useful.


When you say "restrictions", I assume you mean "proprietary code"?
Maybe we could re-implement the runtime to remove the proprietary code?




Can you explain this a little more...are you generating some kind of
intermediate code and then translating that to native code, or ???


Eric


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.