Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
22 Apr 2006 10:00:22 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture acampbellb@hotmail.com (Avatar) (2006-04-21)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture brennie@dcsi.net.au (2006-04-22)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-04-22)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture brennie@dcsi.net.au (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-04-25)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Apr 2006 10:00:22 -0400
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 06-04-126
Keywords: VM, design
Posted-Date: 22 Apr 2006 10:00:22 EDT

On 21 Apr 2006 23:49:01 -0400, Avatar wrote:


> Any thoughts on these two stack architectures would be greatly
> appreciated?


I used three stacks. One was roughly what you call execution
stack. Two others were for arguments and locals. These two were
switched. When a function was called, its result was expected on the
current stack, the arguments were pushed onto another stack. Upon a
call stacks were swapped.


--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.