Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
15 Mar 2006 22:11:00 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: Dangling else wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-02-24)
Re: Dangling else rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2006-02-24)
Re: Dangling else Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca (Brian Inglis) (2006-03-11)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-03-12)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2006-03-14)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-03-14)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-03-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Mar 2006 22:11:00 -0500
Organization: dotat labs
References: 06-02-154 06-02-168 06-03-024 06-03-038
Keywords: syntax
Posted-Date: 15 Mar 2006 22:11:00 EST

Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>
>I can't remember which languages (besides A68) allowed one to modify
>the precedence of operators, however there must have been a few,
>especially if one includes the "extensible languages" that were once
>popular and are now mostly forgotten.


Many functional programming languages allow you to specify the precedence
and associativity of operators, including ML and Haskell.


Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
NORWEGIAN BASIN: IN EAST, SOUTHERLY GALE 8 TO STORM 10, DECREASING 6 TO GALE
8 LATER. RAIN. MODERATE OCCASIONALLY POOR. IN WEST, VARIABLE BECOMING NORTH OR
NORTHWEST 4, INCREASING 5 OR 6 LATER. RAIN THEN FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.