Re: Why context-free?

Ivan Boldyrev <boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru>
10 Oct 2005 01:15:59 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-10-08)
Re: Why context-free? vidyut.vidyut@gmail.com (2005-10-08)
Re: Why context-free? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-10-09)
Re: Why context-free? mpah@thegreen.co.uk (2005-10-09)
Re: Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-10-09)
Re: Why context-free? rfigura@erbse.azagtoth.de (Robert Figura) (2005-10-10)
Re: Why context-free? boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2005-10-10)
Re: Why context-free? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2005-10-13)
Re: Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-10-13)
Re: Why context-free? cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-10-13)
Re: Why context-free? neelk@cs.cmu.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2005-10-13)
Re: Why context-free? darius@raincode.com (Darius Blasband) (2005-10-13)
Re: Why context-free? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2005-10-14)
[15 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ivan Boldyrev <boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Oct 2005 01:15:59 -0400
Organization: this field is intentionally left blank
References: 05-10-053 05-10-061 05-10-062 05-10-068
Keywords: syntax
Posted-Date: 10 Oct 2005 01:15:59 EDT
X-Mantra: OM MANI PADME HUM

On 9258 day of my life glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
> [You're right, but all the TeX users I know use the pre-written macros
> in LaTeX and avoid doing any syntax magic of their own. -John]


But some packages for LaTeX use such a magic very actively. For
example, babel -- multilingual support.


--
Ivan Boldyrev

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.