Re: Implementing classes

david.boyle@gmail.com
14 Sep 2005 21:22:44 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: Implementing classes nathan.moore@cox.net (Nathan Moore) (2005-08-31)
Implementing classes jatinb@noida.hcltech.com (Jatin Bhateja, Noida) (2005-09-02)
Re: Implementing classes Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2005-09-04)
Re: Implementing classes kszabo@bcml120x.ca.nortel.com (2005-09-10)
Re: Implementing classes darnottJUNK@rogers.com (Doug Arnott) (2005-09-11)
Re: Implementing classes oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) (2005-09-11)
Re: Implementing classes david.boyle@gmail.com (2005-09-14)
Re: Implementing classes der_julian@web.de (Julian Stecklina) (2005-09-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: david.boyle@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Sep 2005 21:22:44 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 05-09-01105-09-035 05-09-048
Keywords: OOP
Posted-Date: 14 Sep 2005 21:22:44 EDT

Oliver Bandel wrote:
<snip>
>
> Isn't LISP's OO-System the most powerfull?


Depends how you define "powerful"...with difficulty, would be my guess!


> And what's about labguages which have functional Objects,
> for example OCaml?!


C++ has functors, C# has delegates...


<snip>


Cheers,


Dave Boyle

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.