Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler djm52@cornell.edu (Daniel Marques) (2005-05-13) |
| Re: Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler mayan@sandbridgetech.com (Mayan Moudgill) (2005-05-14) |
| Re: Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-05-14) |
| Re: Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler js@cs.tu-berlin.de (2005-05-14) |
| Re: Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler djm52@cornell.edu (Daniel Marques) (2005-05-16) |
| Re: Strange Behavior With Solaris (Sparc) C Compiler touati@prism.uvsq.fr (TOUATI Sid) (2005-05-20) |
| From: | TOUATI Sid <touati@prism.uvsq.fr> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.unix.solaris,comp.compilers |
| Date: | 20 May 2005 16:07:25 -0400 |
| Organization: | Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines |
| References: | 05-05-065 05-05-076 |
| Keywords: | code, debug |
| Posted-Date: | 20 May 2005 16:07:25 EDT |
>
> It could be the compiler is optimizing away one of the static variables.
It seems difficult to imagine that the Sun compiler did such
optimization at level -O0, which is usually dedicated to simple code
optimization.
S
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.