Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-11) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-02-12) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-12) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2005-02-13) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages cartazio@gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) (2005-02-13) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2005-02-13) |
| Re: The compilation approach in modern languages gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-02-13) |
| [16 later articles] |
| From: | "Ganny" <sgganesh@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 11 Feb 2005 22:31:56 -0500 |
| Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
| Keywords: | design, question |
| Posted-Date: | 11 Feb 2005 22:31:56 EST |
What are the new languages that can possibly become mainstream
programming languages in academia/industry, and what is the
compilation technology they follow?
The arrival of Java bought the use of sophisticaed runtimes VM to the
mainstream (compared to the C/C++ native code approach). Does most of
the newer languages follow the similar approach, or most of them
follow the conventional approach of native code generation?
-Ganesh
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.