Re: Strange C constructs

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
2 Mar 2004 11:08:23 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Strange C constructs vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-26)
Re: Strange C constructs derek@NOSPAMknosof.co.uk (Derek M Jones) (2004-02-26)
Re: Strange C constructs iddw@hotmail.com (2004-02-27)
Re: Strange C constructs jeremy@jdyallop.freeserve.co.uk (Jeremy Yallop) (2004-02-27)
Re: Strange C constructs alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-02-27)
Re: Strange C constructs derek@NOSPAMknosof.co.uk (Derek M Jones) (2004-03-02)
Re: Strange C constructs david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (Dave Thompson) (2004-03-02)
Re: Strange C constructs vbdis@aol.com (2004-03-02)
Re: Strange C constructs viz@pisem.net (Victor Zverovich) (2004-03-02)
Re: Strange C constructs RLake@oxfam.org.pe (2004-03-06)
Re: Strange C constructs nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-03-11)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 2 Mar 2004 11:08:23 -0500
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 04-02-163
Keywords: C
Posted-Date: 02 Mar 2004 11:08:23 EST

  Derek M Jones <derek@NOSPAMknosof.co.uk> schreibt:


>Hang on. I thought you were a fan of standards?


In writing decompilers or C scanners and parsers the official
standards are of little use, because most practical examples are
compatible, at best, only with their own standard, as implied by the
specific compiler :-(


Nonetheless I could make work my type converter now, with VC and gcc
header files. Now I can proceed with the cross compiler, and hope that
it will work in a few weeks ;-)


DoDi

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.