Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr

Jan C.=?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?= <jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de>
12 Oct 2003 19:01:33 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr tim.jones@mail.com (2003-10-08)
Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-10-12)
Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de (Jan C.=?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2003-10-12)
Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr firefly@diku.dk (Peter \Firefly\Lund) (2003-10-12)
Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-10-13)
Re: Alpha assembly language - ldah/lda after jsr gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-10-13)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Jan C.=?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?= <jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Oct 2003 19:01:33 -0400
Organization: MediaSec Technologies GmbH
References: 03-10-040
Keywords: assembler, optimize
Posted-Date: 12 Oct 2003 19:01:33 EDT

There was a discussion here recently - maybe a few months back - which,
IIRC, said that this use of ldah/lda is coded PC-relative, and you thus
can't easily move the routine prologue.


Jan


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.