| Related articles |
|---|
| RegEx: AND operator nikt@wp.pl (jan) (2003-10-12) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator vannoord@let.rug.nl (2003-10-13) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator ahelin@student.oulu.fi (2003-10-13) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator henry@spsystems.net (2003-10-14) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2003-10-14) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator nikt@wp.pl (jan) (2003-10-18) |
| Re: RegEx: AND operator nikt@wp.pl (jan) (2003-10-19) |
| From: | "jan" <nikt@wp.pl> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 12 Oct 2003 18:49:59 -0400 |
| Organization: | http://news.icm.edu.pl/ |
| Keywords: | lex, question |
| Posted-Date: | 12 Oct 2003 18:49:59 EDT |
The algorithms for translation of regex into NFA are popular; however,
in none have I seen support for the AND (&) operator. It might be
implemented as another NFA that is run in the required range
(eg. regex (a.* & ~abc)+ would make one NFA (a.*)+ and for each
matched (a.*) it would test the other NFA: ~abc) but that's not a good
solution, besides it won't allow creating NFA. Anybody can help?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.