Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
27 Sep 2003 13:54:12 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language albertodemichelis@hotmail.com (2003-09-09)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language visionary25@hotmail.com (Vis Mike) (2003-09-14)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language me@here.there.com (Peter Ashford) (2003-09-22)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language emonk@slingshot.co.nz (Corey Murtagh) (2003-09-22)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-09-23)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-09-23)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language vbdis@aol.com (2003-09-27)
Re: [ANN] Squirrel yet another scripting language visionary25@hotmail.com (Vis Mike) (2003-09-27)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Sep 2003 13:54:12 -0400
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 03-09-067
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 27 Sep 2003 13:54:12 EDT

Corey Murtagh <emonk@slingshot.co.nz> schreibt:


>The only even slightly tricky part is that the test expression defaults
>to true.


There exists another trick, that "continue" within a C for loop will
go to the increment expression, not to the loop test. This behaviour
cannot be emulated in while loops, without explicit goto's instead of
continue.


In my C decompiler I used this special encoding to definitely separate
for loops from other loop types :-)


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.