Re: Making a partial C compiler

torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ęgidius Mogensen)
5 Jun 2003 22:53:48 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: Making a partial C compiler idbaxter@semdesigns.com (2003-05-24)
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-05-29)
Re: Making a partial C compiler vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-03)
Re: Making a partial C compiler lars@bearnip.com (2003-06-03)
Re: Making a partial C compiler boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2003-06-03)
Re: Making a partial C compiler jyrixx@astro.temple.edu (2003-06-03)
Re: Making a partial C compiler torbenm@diku.dk (2003-06-05)
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-06-08)
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-06-08)
Re: Making a partial C compiler vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-20)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ęgidius Mogensen)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 5 Jun 2003 22:53:48 -0400
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
References: 03-05-202 03-06-008
Keywords: code
Posted-Date: 05 Jun 2003 22:53:48 EDT

As for code obfuscation, the most effective way I can imagine is to
write your program in Haskell, use GHC (the Glasgow Haskell Compiler)
to produce C and distribute that (in compiled or source form). Few
people will be able to make any kind of sense out of that!
Furthermore, you gain the advantage of faster development that using a
high-level language provides.


Torben Mogensen


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.