Re: simple vs complex languages

Thant Tessman <thant@acm.org>
12 May 2003 01:41:14 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: simple vs complex languages scott.moore6@attbi.com (Scott Moore) (2003-05-06)
Re: simple vs complex languages tmk@netvision.net.il (2003-05-06)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages George.Russell@cis.strath.ac.uk (George Richard Russell) (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages torbenm@diku.dk (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages spencer@panix.com (David Spencer) (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages thant@acm.org (Thant Tessman) (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-14)
Re: simple vs complex languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-05-15)
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-05-15)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-16)
[25 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Thant Tessman <thant@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 May 2003 01:41:14 -0400
Organization: XMission http://www.xmission.com/
References: 03-04-095 03-04-112 03-05-006
Keywords: design, visual
Posted-Date: 12 May 2003 01:41:14 EDT

Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:


[...]


> I really think it is a pity that no language offers a fancier
> interface than plain textual files, typed thru an editor. The syntax
> directed editors of the late 1980's are gone. [...]


I used to take an interest in what at one time were called "visual
languages" (before Microsoft so brutishly usurped the term). There were
a few novel ones, but more common were applications that allowed user
customization by way of a graphical representation of modules and wires.
The earliest I am aware of was the "language" for programming the Evans
& Sutherland PS 300 graphics workstation.


Inspired by what I was learning at the time about functional programming
languages and type systems, I convinced myself that the language of
modules-and-wires could be extended with just a few choice visual
metaphors to gain all the expressiveness of a textual programming language.


Unfortunately, I've never had the opportunity to fully persue the idea.


-thant


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.