Re: "Near Miss" error handling?

"Ian Trudel" <ian.trudel@tr.cgocable.ca>
31 Mar 2001 02:52:16 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
"Near Miss" error handling? gwyn@thislove.dyndns.org (2001-03-27)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? jbeniston@siroyan.com (Jon Beniston) (2001-03-28)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? eeide@cs.utah.edu (Eric Eide) (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? eballen1@qwest.net (Bruce Ediger) (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? guerby@acm.org (Laurent Guerby) (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? samiam@cisco.com (Scott Moore) (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? ian.trudel@tr.cgocable.ca (Ian Trudel) (2001-03-31)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-04-04)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-04-04)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? uabbwat@uab.ericsson.se (Barry Watson) (2001-04-04)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-04-14)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? henry@spsystems.net (2001-04-15)
Re: "Near Miss" error handling? dmitry@elros.cbb-automation.de (2001-04-16)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Ian Trudel" <ian.trudel@tr.cgocable.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:52:16 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 01-03-135
Keywords: parse, errors
Posted-Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:52:16 EST

"Gwyn Judd" <gwyn@thislove.dyndns.org> a écrit dans le message news:
> basically when the compiler comes across an identifier it
> hasn't seen before, it will go through the list of known identifiers
> and try to determine which is the closest so it can then make a
> hopefully helpful suggestion on how to correct the error.


Smalltalk does this for ages, as far as I remember. At least every dialects
I've used until now.


regards,
Ian


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.