Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language?

Thomas Maslen <maslen@pobox.com>
18 Jan 2001 01:07:55 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Microsoft Intermediate Language? dave@prim.demon.co.uk (David Griffiths) (2000-12-23)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2000-12-24)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-12-24)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? vbdis@aol.com (2000-12-31)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-12-31)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? kaushik@ruksun.com (Kaushik Sridharan) (2001-01-05)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? maslen@pobox.com (Thomas Maslen) (2001-01-18)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-02-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Thomas Maslen <maslen@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Jan 2001 01:07:55 -0500
Organization: Distributed Systems Technology CRC
References: 00-12-103 00-12-107
Keywords: UNCOL
Posted-Date: 18 Jan 2001 01:07:54 EST

"Mike Dimmick" <mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk> writes:
[...]
>I _do_ know that it was designed to support C, C++, C#, Visual Basic, Cobol,
>Perl, Fortran and many other languages (Eiffel, Microsoft Research are
>producing a version of Standard ML).


The devil may be in the details -- some of the languages had their
semantics munged in the process, e.g. Eiffel# rather than Eiffel.


Thomas Maslen
maslen@pobox.com

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.