| Related articles |
|---|
| Backward semantic analysis of Oracle SQL yong321@yahoo.com (2000-08-10) |
| Re: Backward semantic analysis of Oracle SQL Frank.Gerlach@brokat.de (Frank Gerlach) (2000-08-13) |
| Re: Backward semantic analysis of Oracle SQL bonzini@gnu.org (2000-08-13) |
| From: | bonzini@gnu.org (\"Carlo, Paolo & Germana\") |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 13 Aug 2000 19:19:22 -0400 |
| Organization: | Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
| References: | 00-08-052 |
| Keywords: | analysis, question |
> Back to my question. Why does Oracle check existence (and possibly user
> permission) of objects referred to by identifiers in a backward order?
There might be more exotic reasons, but I suspect it is only because
ASTs often use lists, and when you're adding to a list it is easier to
`add to the front' than to `add to the tail'.
Paolo
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.