Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those?

"Darren Forcier" <dforcier@allaire.com>
18 Jul 2000 13:17:16 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? iank@idiom.com (2000-07-01)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? pedwards@dmapub.dma.org (2000-07-01)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (2000-07-04)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? jerry@swsl.co.uk (2000-07-04)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? Frank.Gerlach@brokat.de (Frank Gerlach) (2000-07-18)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? chris@cjl1.demon.co.uk (Chris Locke) (2000-07-18)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? dforcier@allaire.com (Darren Forcier) (2000-07-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Darren Forcier" <dforcier@allaire.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Jul 2000 13:17:16 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: 00-06-112
Keywords: parse

I'm currently working with a commercial parsing tool called Programmar
(www.programmar.com) which
is excellent. It uses an EBNF "object oriented" grammar language and
includes a visual IDE (helpful for me as a parsing journeyman, not a master
craftsman)... It provides a C++ library as well as a COM wrapper for
integrating into other tools like VB and Delphi.


Darren Forcier


"Tuukka Tikkanen" <spamtrap@tic0.net> wrote in message
> Are lex and yacc (or flex and bison, if you prefer) still the only
> practical tools to go about making lexers and parsers?

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.