Re: SARITH: Safe ARITHmetic - A Progress Report

Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
19 Feb 2000 00:29:54 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
SARITH: Safe ARITHmetic - A Progress Report geoff@elj.com (2000-02-05)
Re: SARITH: Safe ARITHmetic - A Progress Report bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) (2000-02-19)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Feb 2000 00:29:54 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: 00-02-022
Keywords: arithmetic

geoff@elj.com writes:


> "wrap-around" result. It is certainly not new: Ada is an example of a
> high-level language that implements saturation; ...


Ada has no predefined/built-in support for saturation. Ada has two
kinds of integer types: one kind detects overflow (raises an
exception). The other kind (called "modular types") wraps around.


Perhaps you meant that one could define such a thing in Ada, using
user-defined operator symbols and so forth?


> Everything so far is 100% tested (for all possible input value
> combinations).


How long does it take to test, say, add of two 32-bit unsigned integers?
There are about 10**19 input value combinations.


;-) ;-)


- Bob


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.